Back to Workflows
automationintermediate

Decision‑Ready Signal Checkpoints

A guided triage flow that helps teams separate trustworthy branch signals from polished noise, catch dirty data early, and decide when to use automation vs human judgment.

Calypso
1 integrations

Integrations

WhatsApp

Tags

signal-qualitybranch-metricsdecision-makingdata-hygieneattribution

Workflow Visualization

Rendered directly from the published workflow JSON.

17 nodes15 connections
CFlow settingsFlow ConfigsConfigConfigGuided triage to separatetrustworthy branch signals frompolished no...Trigger: inputDefines the graph defaultsIIncoming messageInputInputInputWhatsApp entry pointNew conversations begin hereKBKnowledge base…Knowledge BotResponseResponsePrioritize practical,non-academic guidance. Focus…Mode: defaultFallback enabledIMChoose your decision…Interactive MessageResponseResponseWhat are you trying to decideright now? Pick the closestmatch and I’ll give you...6 options • Trust branch numb...• Spot dirty signal...Tip: If it’s high-stakes, choose…IFIf: branch numbersIFLogicLogicbranch_numbers =TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitTChecklist: trust vs…Simple MessageResponseResponseBranch numbers you can trusttend to be boring in the rightways. Here’s the quick trust…860 charsIFIf: dirty signalIFLogicLogicdirty_signal =TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitTChecklist: dirty…Simple MessageResponseResponseDirty signal usually shows upas “everything looksplausible.” Use these tripwire…816 charsIFIf: automation vs…IFLogicLogicautomation_vs_judgm...TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitTGuide: when to trust…Simple MessageResponseResponseWhen to trust automation (andwhen to insist on humans):Trust automation when: - The…609 charsIFIf: compare branches…IFLogicLogiccompare_branches =TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitTChecklist: comparison…Simple MessageResponseResponseBranch comparisons andattribution are where smartteams repeatedly misread…761 charsIFIf: signal cultureIFLogicLogicsignal_culture =TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitTPlaybook: build signa…Simple MessageResponseResponseA signal culture that helpsdecisions happen (not justslides) looks like this: - One…669 charsIFIf: talk to a personIFLogicLogichandoff =TRUE -> next FALSE -> waitFHHuman handoffMessenger HandoffHandoffHandoffSupportGot it—looping in a human. Sharethe branch, timeframe, and the…Routes the conversation to a…FHDefault handoff (no…Messenger HandoffHandoffHandoffSupportI may be missing context. I’mlooping in a human—tell us what…Routes the conversation to a…

Use the JSON view if you need to inspect or copy the exact structure.

Workflow guide

A practical operator-friendly explanation of how this automation works.

4 sections

How it works

This workflow is a practical “signal triage” assistant for teams who make decisions from branch numbers, conversations, and attribution. It routes people to short, decision-shaped checklists that reveal what’s likely trustworthy, what’s probably polished noise, and what to verify before a confident meeting drives the org into a confident wrong turn.

It starts with a knowledge-backed policy to answer questions consistently, then offers a menu of common decision situations (branch numbers, dirty signal, automation vs judgment, comparisons, and culture). Each path ends with an actionable checklist you can apply immediately.

Key features

  • Knowledge-base-first responses to keep signal guidance consistent before routing
  • Menu-based routing for fast triage (no long forms; just pick the decision situation)
  • Practical checklists focused on what breaks first: definitions, coverage, timing, incentives, and outliers
  • Dedicated path for “automation vs judgment” to prevent silent over-trust in dashboards
  • Human handoff option when the situation is sensitive or high-stakes

Step-by-step

  1. Start: The workflow begins when a message arrives.
  2. Knowledge base guardrails: The assistant prioritizes approved knowledge for signal design and decision guidance.
  3. Pick your situation: A list menu asks what you’re trying to decide (branch numbers, dirty signal, automation vs judgment, comparisons, culture, or handoff).
  4. Branch numbers — trust vs noise: If selected, the workflow sends a checklist for determining whether a branch metric deserves trust.
  5. Dirty signal — spot it early: If selected, the workflow sends quick tests to catch contamination before it derails a meeting.
  6. Automation vs judgment: If selected, the workflow sends rules-of-thumb for when to trust automation and when to require human review.
  7. Compare branches & attribution: If selected, the workflow sends a comparison/attribution sanity checklist to avoid repeated misreads.
  8. Build signal culture: If selected, the workflow sends a short playbook for building a culture where signals drive decisions (not slide decks).
  9. Talk to a person: If selected—or if nothing matches—the workflow routes to a human handoff message.

Setup requirements

  • Calypso: A workspace with this workflow installed.
  • WhatsApp channel: Connected in Calypso to use interactive list messages.
  • Knowledge base: Add/enable your internal articles on branch metrics, attribution, and signal definitions (no additional credentials required beyond Calypso access).

Ready to use this workflow?

Import this workflow into your Calypso account and start automating your processes.

Go to Calypso