Decision-Ready Signals Coach

This workflow turns messy branch numbers, conversation notes, and attribution stories into decision-shaped guidance a team can actually use. It starts with a Knowledge Base pass (so the assistant can answer from your internal definitions), then routes the user through a short menu of the most common “confidently wrong” decision traps.

Use it when leaders are about to compare branches, defend a funnel number, or automate a decision based on signals that look clean—but might be quietly misleading. The goal isn’t perfect data; it’s trustworthy judgment under time pressure.

• Knowledge Base-first behavior to anchor answers in your definitions (metrics, branch policies, attribution rules).
• A simple menu that routes users into decision-ready playbooks (trust checks, dirty signal spotting, automation vs judgment).
• Practical guidance designed for meetings: what to verify first, what to ignore, and what usually breaks.
• A safe “talk to a human” handoff path for high-stakes calls or disputed numbers.

1. Trigger: The workflow starts when a user opens the conversation (Input).
2. Knowledge Base check: The assistant attempts to answer using your Knowledge Base and stays aligned to internal definitions.
3. Pick a decision problem: The user gets a menu with six options:
   1. Which branch numbers deserve trust
   2. Spot dirty signal before the meeting
   3. Trust automation vs human judgment
   4. Compare branches & attribution without self-deception
   5. Build a signal culture (decisions, not slides)
   6. Talk to a human
4. Routing: Based on the selected button, the workflow routes through an IF ladder to the matching guidance message.
5. Outcome: The user receives a concise, usable checklist and “what goes wrong first” warnings—or is handed off to a human owner.

• No credentials required to deploy this workflow.
• (Recommended) Populate your Knowledge Base with metric definitions, branch event rules, attribution logic, and any “official” reporting caveats so answers stay consistent.