Branch Signal Confidence Screener

This workflow gives branch leaders a fast, decision-shaped “reality check” on the signals they’re about to use. Instead of debating dashboards, it routes them through a short menu: which numbers to trust, how to spot dirty signal early, when automation is safe, and what teams routinely misread when comparing branches.

It’s designed for the moment right before a confident meeting goes off the rails—when the data looks polished, the story feels neat, and the risk is highest. You’ll get crisp prompts that favor usable judgment over academic purity.

• Knowledge-base policy sets a practical, plain-English advisory tone (no slide-deck cosplay).
• Button-based menu routes users to the exact decision check they need—fast.
• “Trust vs. noise” guidance tailored to branch metrics, conversations, and attribution comparisons.
• Clear guardrails on when to trust automation and when humans must step in.
• Optional handoff to a human owner when the situation is high-stakes or unclear.

1. Input trigger starts the workflow when a user opens the conversation.
2. Knowledge Base Policy applies the workflow’s guidance style (direct, practical, anti-false-confidence).
3. Interactive menu asks what the user needs help with (trust numbers, dirty signal, automation vs. judgment, messy evidence, branch comparisons, signal culture, or human help).
4. Routing checks (IF nodes) evaluate which button was clicked.
5. Text guidance returns a concise, operator-ready checklist for the selected topic.
6. Human handoff (optional) routes to a fallback path when the user selects “Talk to a human.”

• No credentials required.
• Publish this workflow to a Calypso Inbox channel where branch leaders or operators can message in.
• (Optional) If you use department routing, set the fallback department to the correct owner in your Calypso workspace.